Disentangling the associations between employment, income and antidepressant use: an application of the parametric G-formula

Maarten J. Bijlsma, Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research
Lasse Tarkiainen, University of Helsinki
Mikko Myrskylä, Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research and London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
Pekka Martikainen, University of Helsinki

Background: Employment, income and health are intertwined. Unfortunately, the existing literature typically does not treat them as such. This hinders estimation of the causal effects of these variables on one another. Data & methods: We use annual Finnish register data on a cohort of individuals aged 15+ (n = 42,172) in the period 1996-2007. We model the time-dependent relations between employment, income, antidepressant purchases, other drug purchases, and education, while adjusting for potential confounders. We perform mediation analysis using the G-formula; reciprocal time-dependent relations are modeled and life-course trajectories under particular interventions are simulated. Results: In the data, 75% of observed person-years were employed, 12% unemployed and the remainder being some other status. By intervening on employment so that all unemployed person-years were employed at all times, the population-averaged hazard ratio of first antidepressant use was reduced by 5.8% (95% CI: 1.5% to 9.4%). Roughly 67% of this reduction is a direct effect of employment, 20% is due to income, while the remainder goes through other pathways. Conclusion: Being employed lowers the risk of depression. A large part of this component is likely psychological, since only part of the employment effect is mediated by material factors such as income.

See extended abstract

 Presented in Session 39. Employment and well-being